i have removed the twitter parser for this site -
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Monday, June 15, 2009
June 15th, 2009
So yes with me writing several snippets a week via google reader, it would have been easy to automate consistent tweets. But I felt bad about twitter from the start - ( several of me twittered snarks were deleted ) and that made it hard for a generally grumpy person to tweet his mind.
This and several NDA signings kind of killed my optimism about using twitter.
Then Twitter decided to allow business use And also allowed MSM opinionaters and politicians to say stuff far worse then -Mike Arrington is full of himself- (one of the early tweets that got missing via twitter police )
Its now the 3d Monday I have been waiting for an answer from twitter if i can have the Internetjoe name and no answer…well i dont care!!!
Im finished with twitter and will use laconia for my new VJ project which will run on PCs Macs Playstation Wii and Xbox360 SO THERE :P
good luck other Internetjoe the MLM business sales person whos not an artist or programmer.
Selfgrowth.com we steal your name
June 1st, 2009
So how does this work… Based on what i know about DMCA and the TOS of twitter , the only way someone can use my name is in a parody not as a business.
Joe 'Asshole' ( not his real name ) says if i give him the USPTO documentation he will give me my name back . How white of him………..
So the US government expects me to file a form for every piece of text i post and artwork i create ……. NO that's not how it works, I would spend 3/4 of my time submitting forms.
A Copyright/trademark IS only needed if there is no prior use of the name or art, Prior published usage trumps trademark/copyright law( ie i published a magazine called colored truths in the late 80s, though i did not apply to the copyright office, i and my writers still own that material )
Here is my first email to him which he ignored
So you claim to be able to use internetjoe as your twitter handle, i would not mind that as much as the fact that u use it as part of your business dealings.
i have used inj/internetjoe for over 14 years, please stop the business chat or drop the handle.
i added a google search link with documents showing internetjoe as my name back to 2000.
On 5-24 i found this guy using my name
on 5-26 i sent the above email
on 5-29 i sent this
Dude how sad
your dont answer my email - just post more business links on twitter with my name.
As i showed you with that link i have web copyrighted pages with that name going back to the 1990s on geocities.
You have no case. I have requested from twitter the name be given to me as per there copyright policy.
thanks for your time
No answer so i email the web master of his company - 06-01
Empolyee missuse of twitter
For a company that claims selfhelp your employee Joe @@asshole@@ has gone against that principal.
If he is just dumb and never thought someone might be using that name or if he searched the name and ignored my entries , either way that's bad business on the Internet.
here are my still unanswered emails to him -( here i attached the emails to him)
Low and behold he answers my first email magically a few hours later
> Thanks for the email. I am sorry about the confusion.
> If you own the trademark on the use of "Internet Joe", I will be happy to change the name on the account. Can you please send me official trademark certification information from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and I will promptly change the name on my account.
Notice the IF - like if you know someone else that uses internetjoe ONE WORD AS there main name to produce work.
But i got nothing Good to say about a company that would hire a jerk like this
You Sir ARE NOT Internetjoe
May 29th, 2009
Man it's a sad state of affairs when a open copyright believer needs to call copyright or trademark on someone.
I am internetjoe have been for a long time
I work very hard to keep up my appearance on the web and as such do my weekly vanity google of my names.
Last week i noticed a internetjoe ( one word no space ) link that was not me and tracked it down to a twitter user. What i found scared me as this person who also seems to be from "new jersey" was using my name to do his companies business.
Now the issue arises as i try to email him with a request to stop the business chat ( even offered to let him have the name if he just did not do business with it .. ) So he answered me today not by an email response but by twittering another business link.
So now i have to fax forms to twitter and make a formal request for name transfer.
I worked hard for the rep of a anarchist and dont need someone thinking it was the JoeDauz Internetjoe that sent that junk mail.
Friday, February 20, 2009
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Follow my pictures -follow my words - follow my actions - follow my thoughts
Tools,How sad that the main point of open standards talk is that we should all use them. Open does not mean mandatory.
The ART of Joe Dauz ..... Jan2006 to Dec2009
Crazy wing-nuts and a hard ass
How could I know that the blog service i became part of was run by and full of close-minded Conservatives.
Learning to crawl on the web
Can i write a opinion piece a week.
Where can i put up my art beside my old gallery
Blogger does not do video or flash at this time
Dont be an angry do nothing - put up or shut up.
Due to the din of crap MSM was spewing about our war with Iraq - decided to create a link list of Real News not Bushified News.
Malkin Makes Good Headline Fodder
Decided to try to write cool headlines , this is where i did it
Its all about the writers story
On the 19th-20th I took it on myself to read each participants blog post, link the post and pull the direct quote that best describes the writers point of view.and make a dedicated linklist page for event.
Blogswarm against the iraq war.
Sphere: Related Content
Monday, January 12, 2009
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Obama's Duty To Prosecute Bush For War Crimes by Patriot Daily at Docudharma, Monday December 29, 2008 at 14:14:19 PST If you wish to repost this essay you can download a .txt file of the html here (right click and save). Permission granted.
Obama promised that he would investigate and prosecute Bush team for "genuine crimes" because no one is above the law, but he would not prosecute "really dumb policies." Obama plans to have his AG review the available information to determine if investigations are needed. Well, AG nominee Eric Holder knows that many crimes have been committed:
Our government authorized the use of torture, approved of secret electronic surveillance against American citizens, secretly detained American citizens without due process of law, denied the writ of habeas corpus to hundreds of accused enemy combatants and authorized the use of procedures that violate both international law and the United States Constitution.... We owe the American people a reckoning.
Indeed, the rule of law is the "strongbox that keeps all our other values safe." We can write laws that say we have certain freedoms and rights, and we can build courts and elect lawmakers, but if there is no rule of law, then we lose our rights bit by bit until they are no longer recognizable. This is one reason why budhydharma and Docudharma have drafted a petition asking Holder to appoint a Special Prosecutor to investigate and prosecute any government official who has participated in War Crimes.
While the goppies will cry "partisan witch hunt," even the Bush State Dept. recognizes that no democratic society can tolerate abuses when people are tortured or kidnapped under rendition in violation of our rule of law or tolerate the failure to prosecute in compliance with our Constitution.
Signing the petition is not in defiance of our President-Elect Obama, but rather a sign of support for the difficult times that he and Holder will face when performing their clear constitutional duties.
As President, Obama will have the constitutional duty to faithfully execute our laws.
The constitutional oath of office requires that our President faithfully execute the office of President and preserve, protect and defend our Constitution. Our constitution also requires that our presidents "shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed." The principle of the rule of law is partially based on this Faithfully Execute clause which requires our President to comply with laws, our Constitution and treaties because our Constitution established a government of laws, not of men and women.
The Geneva Convention is one of the laws which must be faithfully executed.
Our constitution mandates that treaties are one of the laws that the President must faithfully execute. Moreover, treaties are recognized as one of our supreme laws of the land alongside our Constitution and federal laws. For over 200 years, the federal courts have reaffirmed that our President is bound by the laws of war, which include conventions. In fact, both Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006) addressed the issue of whether the US government was violating the terms of the 1949 Geneva Convention. Yet, some will whine that it is partisan to not exempt Bush from 200 years of precedent that governed presidents from both parties.
The Geneva Convention imposes a duty to prosecute former presidents who committed war crimes.
The Geneva Convention mandates that the US "search" for persons "alleged" to have committed or ordered the commission of "torture or inhuman treatment" and then prosecute in our courts or extradite to another country for prosecution. The "grave breaches" protected by the Convention also include the rendition or "unlawful transfer of a non-prisoner of war from occupied territory."
Rounding up the suspects is easy.
There is an overloaded plate of issues awaiting the leadership of President Obama. Fortunately, neither AG Holder nor an independent commission will have to spend a lot of time searching for alleged perps of war crimes. This diary has pictures of some of the "persons of interest," as Bush likes to say, who either have admitted their complicity in war crimes or may be percipient witnesses with useful information.
Bush and Cheney have already essentially publicly admitted their roles in authorizing and ordering torture. In Spring 2008, Bush admitted in an ABC interview that he approved "enhanced interrogation" techniques, including waterboarding:
"As a matter of fact," Bush added, "I told the country we did that. And I told them it was legal. We had legal opinions that enabled us to do it." The president added, "I didn't have any problems at all trying to find out what Khalid Sheik Mohammed knew."
In 2006, Cheney stated that dunking terrorism suspects in water was a "no-brainer" method of interrogation. After a public outcry, Cheney denied that dunking was equivalent to waterboarding, but merely referenced a literal "dunk in the water." Either way, Cheney is screwed because both waterboarding and water dunking is illegal under US and international law.
In 2008, Cheney went even further by essentially admitting that he personally authorized the use of waterboarding and thus a war crime. As constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley states, Bush and Cheney are banking that the public will not have the stomach to prosecute them.
We also know that high-level officials participated in approving interrogation methods at National Security Principals Committee meetings in the WH over the span of at least 2 years in which the CIA wanted approvals before conducting interrogation in individual cases. Thus, we can add Rice, Rumsfeld, Powell, Tenet and Ashcroft to the list of "persons of interest."
Tenet and Bush have both stated that waterboarding was legal based on a memorandum, known as the "Golden Shield," because it was designed to shield CIA officers from liability. The Golden Shield memo was written by John Yoo and approved by then-chief of the Office of Legal Counsel, Jay Bybee. In 2004, the Golden Shield legal memo which authorized the interrogation program was withdrawn by Jack Goldsmith, who called the memo "slapdash" and "deeply flawed."
Holder could also have a chat with Air Force Col. Morris Davis, a former prosecutor, who testified on behalf of a prisoner at Guantánamo that Brig. Gen. Thomas W. Hartmann "insisted that prosecutors proceed with evidence they had obtained through waterboarding and other methods of torture."
The other benefit of war crimes prosecutions is that the Geneva Convention seems pretty clear that Bush can not whip out an executive order or pardon to immunize himself or his cronies from liability. Article 51 of the Convention states that "[n]o High Contracting Party shall be allowed to absolve itself or any other High Contracting Party of any liability incurred by itself or by another High Contracting Party in respect of breaches referred to in the preceding Article," which is a reference to Article 50 that defines grave breaches.
There may be some in DC who wish to avoid any investigations for fear of putative complicity, but this simply illustrates the bipartisan nature of any investigation. It's not just the goppies: For whatever reason, Senator Leahy declared that the Bush team would not face prosecution for war crimes in the US. And, any investigation could reach some in the new Obama administration, like Robert Gates, for his role in Guantánamo and Iraqi prisons, "which the Washington Post described in a headline as 'a Prison Full of Innocent Men,' without even a procedure for determining their guilt or innocence--unquestionably a violation of the Geneva Conventions in and of itself."
If nothing else, our votes should have sent the message loud and clear to DC that Americans repudiate the past 8 lawless years and want a return to the rule of law. For some, the way to return to the rule of law is to move forward without investigating crimes committed by Bushie and his sycophants who viewed the rule of law as malleable chunk of clay. However, political expediency as a reason to avoid prosecutions is also a violation of the rule of law that is based upon blind, nonpartisan justice.
If you wish to repost this essay you can download a .txt file of the html here (right click and save). Permission granted.
Sphere: Related Content
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
The (WSJ) article is just free political advertising, echoing the dark insinuations made by the anonymous "Center for Union Facts" -- or is it the equally secret and misnamed "Americans for Job Security" -- anonymous organization(s) that refuse to reveal their corporate contributors.
Sphere: Related Content
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
The current leader , and grand champion of tainted media is RUPIE NEWS ( ie any Fake or former News organization currently consumed i mean owned by Rupert and his family )
It was bad enough when Mr DeRegulation(G ShrubleU Bush) let a a non US company buy into our airwaves and then let him have special treatment in the ownership of multiple channels and papers in the same region ( A rule made so companies would not monopolize the airwaves and force there ideas on folks ).
Now its just a horror ( A Rupie rag in England quoting a Rupie rag in NY with Rupie Speak on FOX )
Thursday, December 11, 2008
First as alpha then as beta testers, i and many others have had to rebuild from scratch there city 3 times, the reward for that is making us subscribe to test there newest features and not screaming that the latest build lets other players attack your monuments.
The thought that sims, civilization and others let you control way more aspects of not just egypt but the world, make this have to be special. Its not
Posted by internetjoe at 12/11/2008
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
Untraceable 2008 Good Idea Shitty execution
i watch any media with skepticism, the how its done takes priority over the substance of the thing. And unless its a cartoon it takes alot to suspend my disbelief.
So you can imagine my surprise when just several minutes into the film the lead FBI lady comes home and Directly vpns into the FBI main system with remote desktop.
1. Even in a small business this is not recommended security.
Later in the film she twice leaves the VPN screen running with the clid in the house.
2. A FBI Agent would be trained to shut the machine off OR have the machine programmed to shut it self off.
The daughter sees the evil movie on moms computer. (Not even a screen Saver Lock mister director)
3. HOGWASH!!! Windows,Linux and Macintosh All have multiuser privilege abilities. Any admin with a brain would know that a boxed user for the kid IS A GIVEN specially for the FBI.
How can i believe even a good actress if the material background has been ignored. Bad Bad Movie
As a side note If this movie was ment to show what happens to us when our government is populated by friends of Bush and not experts, then it could have been a good movie. As is your better off missing this trace.
Posted by internetjoe at 12/02/2008